LearnFast logo with no background.png

BLOG  |  NEWSLETTER  |  PODCAST  |  FREE RESOURCES  |  SHOP  |  CONFERENCE  |  WHAT'S ON

Delivering the world’s best evidence based solutions for learning

AU 1300 203 104  |  NZ 0800 451 959

At Home  |  At School  |  For BusinessAdults

The Learning Success Blog

How well are school reading programs teaching our students to read?

Posted by Peter Barnes on February 10, 2015 at 2:59 PM

reading Fast ForWordOnce again reading experts are questioning the way many of our children are taught reading.

Pamela Snow, associate Professor of Psychology at Monash University and Speech Pathologist Alison Clarke say that the way we teach most children to read sets them up to fail. They explain why in a recent article in theconversation.com.

A decade has now passed since the 2005 Australian National Enquiry into Teaching of Literacy recommended that the whole language method of teaching reading be replaced by a phonics approach. In that time nothing has changed.

Key points from their article include:

  • There are two main schools of thought about how to teach children to read and write, one focused on meaning (whole language) and one focused on word structure (phonics).
  • There is convincing evidence that the phonics approach works best.
  • The whole language approach seems to work when children start school and they learn to guess or memorise words without sounding them out (as in the phonics approach).
  • But by year three they can start to fail as the words that they need to learn become more complex.
  • Children who don’t learn to read and spell are much more likely to drop out of school early, be unemployed, suffer ill health and get on the wrong side of the law.
  • Children who can’t read much by age nine are in serious trouble. By then, teachers expect them to have finished learning to read and to start seriously reading to learn.
  • Few teachers are trained to systematically teach phonics, which can be viewed by university academics as old-fashioned, reactionary and teacher-centred.
  • The Reading Recovery program, about 80% whole language and 20% phonics, often fails to provide the boost struggling readers need.
  • The vast majority of children will only learn to read and spell when teachers are equipped with the best available methods, based on the evidence.

What can you do if you have students who are struggling to learn to read?

Firstly, if you are a parent, understand that your child’s teachers are doing the best they can with what they have been taught at university.

Secondly, it seems that how reading is taught is not about to change soon. Despite the  recommendations from the Australian government’s 2005 National Enquiry into the Teaching of Literacy, teacher training in universities still largely focusses on whole language.

One option is to consider the Fast ForWord programs which intensively develop not only phonics, but all the other skills necessary for reading success.

 

See Reading Skills Trained by Fast ForWord

 

Related Posts

Reading Programs Evaluated - is Reading Recovery a 'failed program'?

Do NSW Teachers Lack Phonics Skills?

The Brain Science of Language, Learning & Reading

New Patent for Fast Forword Learning Capacity & Reading Program

Topics: Reading

      Subscribe to Email Updates

      Recent Posts

      LearnFast Blog

      All about Neuroscience & Learning

      Are you interested in trends in learning, learning technology, education, neuroscience, or treatments for learning difficulties – including auditory processing disorder, dyslexia, attention, autism and others?

      Do you have children or students you want to help achieve more from their education?

      Does literacy enhancement or English as a Second Language interest you?

      Find out what’s happening on these and other topics related to neuroscience and learning, read comments on the latest research, and join the discussions.